How to overcome challenges related to instructors, resources and funding
Technical rescue training is paramount to performing successful technical rescue operations. That sounds overly simplistic and generic, as it applies to everything we do in public safety. But it’s not that simple.
Tech rescue is a high-risk/low-frequency event that pushes our intellectual, physical and emotional boundaries much further than our other disciplines because of the lack of consistent exposure and the requirement for advanced problem-solving. The consequences for improper solutions are often swift and severe.
Each of the six technical rescue disciplines – rope, confined space, vehicle/machinery, structural collapse, trench and water – has its own knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) that are specific to either Operations- or Technician-level training.
NFPA 1006: Standard for Technical Rescue Personnel Professional Qualifications lays down the ominous, but appropriate, gauntlet of recommending that all KSAs for every organizational rescue discipline be performed annually, at a minimum. Specifically, any rescuer certified to any discipline has to complete the KSAs connected to that discipline and the certification level they have achieved at least once annually. That means if you’re certified in six disciplines to the Technician level, then you must complete both Operations- and Technician-level KSAs annually for all six disciplines.
When tackling the challenge of implementing an effective technical rescue training plan, there are three major obstacles to consider:
During my career, I have tried many different approaches to create effective training plans at my own department, and I have spent my career providing every variety of training solution to outside agencies as a training provider. Let’s explore some lessons learned as well as effective solutions for the three challenges listed above.
There are three options for ensuring that training is high quality and delivered by a knowledgeable team:
Option 1: Find your most motivated and talented people with a passion for tech rescue and create as much opportunity as possible to send them to advanced-level training. This can be a small and focused group that is capable of bringing the information back to the department and conducting in-house training.
There are a lot of benefits to attending high-level courses outside of your state or region: It will bring forth new thoughts and considerations; it can be relatively affordable because the investment is directed toward a small number of individuals; and it gives you the opportunity to sample new gear and equipment before investing. Rely on this core group to become you subject-matter experts for detailing new resources.Hold these people accountable for spreading the wealth by investing their newfound knowledge back at home.
Option 2: Let’s say you’re further down the path of developing internal talent, and you already have some qualified individuals who can instruct. Evaluate opportunities to link your organization to a local vocational school or accredited university that would partner with you in the delivery of technical rescue courses. This is a major undertaking. But it can result in a rescue training campus at your organization in which your instructors are now paid through the college or other auspice and the programming expenses are deferred as well.
This can also lead to memorandums of understanding (MOUs) that entitle you as the host site to barter scholarships or tuition reductions for your own personnel. These types of arrangements can create a lot of synergy within the two entities in which your staff will have an identifiable path to achieve tech rescue certifications and eventually become instructors.
Consistent instruction is one of the best tools to develop high-level proficiency as a practitioner. Teaching material requires a level of mastery and accountability that exceeds simply performing and practicing the material.
This solution can also result in multi-agency cooperation for purchasing resources and equipment. Additionally, vendors or manufacturers are more apt to provide product support for large volume and high decision-maker exposure courses.
Option 3: Contact in an outside training agency to deliver certification courses and even refresher updates as needed. This is your best option for continuity of material and validity of training, provided you’re using a reputable training group.
This approach is not cheap. You are also stuck with pulling large quantities of personnel off company and covering their slots. Again, expensive.
You can seek train-the-trainer opportunities with the training groups and develop plans that move toward an intrinsic solution in which you are eventually delivering and maintaining your own training. Some training organizations will be accommodating with this request and share curriculums and other training modalities, while others will have a significant price tag attached to providing their intellectual property.
Once you identify the disciplines on which you want to train, you have to start with an appropriate environment.
Classrooms, in my opinion, are not as essential as people think they are. I have delivered PowerPoint lecture segments in state-of-the-art auditoriums as well as apparatus bays with a sheet thrown up on the wall and a portable projector.
The deal-breaker or maker is the hands-on environment. I believe it is important for organizations to practice where they will play. This means if you have an industrial complex with confined spaces in your district, you should be training there before an actual event occurs. But this doesn’t mean these are the best sites for all of your training.
You need to develop progressive training environments that maximize repetitions, technical applications, and safety. The environment should be highly controlled and manageable for entry-level abilities. The environment should increase in complexity and realism as the abilities increase. You can also fabricate or develop training simulators and structures to help develop the foundational skills segments.
If the environment is established, then you can start evaluating the equipment needs. Equipment can be challenging because it has to be commensurate with the course design. That often does not align with the organizational resources. For example, a department may have rope rescue capabilities designed to support a mission in which four to six rescuers are on rope and can develop “X” systems. But, if you’re attempting to conduct a training course in which 20 of your members are performing rope rescue skills, you are inadequately equipped. This is where you can look at some options that we’ve already touched on:
Option 1: Contact other departments with additional resources, and make the training session or course a joint venture. This can work out well for myriad reasons:
Option 2: Contact your local equipment dealers and manufacturers. Request product support for your training. You cannot ride this horse forever without some monetary investment at some point. But most dealers and manufacturers are happy to expose potential buyers to available resources. This is a good practice to apply under any circumstance because it allows your organization and personnel to get hands-on time with the latest and greatest gear. Product evaluations should always be conducted prior to investment when possible.
Option 3: Seek funding. This one can be a little more difficult, and it segues into the overall funding challenge.
We’ve already covered this a bit with creative partnerships to offset expenses. However, there is another potential opportunity to offset cost.
OSHA standards require companies with target hazards or activities such as excavation and trenching, fall hazards, and confined space to have specific rescue capabilities in place. This includes a rescue-ready team that is fully equipped and trained to execute a timely rescue. There are a lot of requirements connected to these standards, and most companies cannot comply internally. This means that they are relying on us – their emergency responders – to fulfill their obligation to safety.
Part of the standard requirements state that these companies must make their sites and facilities or similar training locales available for training to the agencies providing their rescue services. Those rescue services must be equipped and trained.
In many situations, these companies providing the financial and physical resources for these requirements are more cost-effective when directed at the emergency response agency, meaning it is cheaper and easier for them to facilitate your operation than creating one of their own. Identifying these companies in your district and starting a proactive dialogue regarding their rescue service provision can often lead to fantastic partnerships that benefit everyone involved.
If you need more detailed guidance on how to apply these resources or options for tech rescue training, connect with neighboring agencies to see what they are doing for training or reach out to me for additional help.
Train hard and stay safe!
Editor's Note: What's your favorite or most challenging tech rescue discipline to cover in training? Share in the comments below or at editor@firerescue1.com.
Copyright © 2024 FireGrantsHelp.com. All rights reserved.
